Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Ode on Melancholy, by John Keats

I.
No, no, go not to Lethe, neither twist
Wolf’s-bane, tight-rooted, for its poisonous wine;
Nor suffer thy pale forehead to be kiss’d
By nightshade, ruby grape of Proserpine;
Make not your rosary of yew-berries,
Nor let the beetle, nor the death-moth be
Your mournful Psyche, nor the downy owl
A partner in your sorrow’s mysteries;
For shade to shade will come too drowsily,
And drown the wakeful anguish of the soul.

II.
But when the melancholy fit shall fall
Sudden from heaven like a weeping cloud,
That fosters the droop-headed flowers all,
And hides the green hill in an April shroud;
Then glut thy sorrow on a morning rose,
Or on the rainbow of the salt sand-wave,
Or on the wealth of globed peonies;
Or if thy mistress some rich anger shows,
Emprison her soft hand, and let her rave,
And feed deep, deep upon her peerless eyes.

III.
She dwells with Beauty — Beauty that must die;
And Joy, whose hand is ever at his lips
Bidding adieu; and aching Pleasure nigh,
Turning to Poison while the bee-mouth sips:
Ay, in the very temple of delight
Veil’d Melancholy has her sovran shrine,
Though seen of none save him whose strenuous tongue
Can burst Joy’s grape against his palate fine;
His soul shall taste the sadness of her might,
And be among her cloudy trophies hung.

Monday, June 29, 2009

BLANK HORIZONS

There are words for what is known;
Identified feelings,
Recognized sensations,
Which seem too limited,
When in my excursions,
I touch upon the bounds of knowledge,
And encounter the blank horizons.

There are no words for what is unknown;
Unrecognized, unidentified,
The ever new vibrations,
Limitless inundations,
The unattainable appellations,
From which I attempt to delineate,
The results of my incursions.

Perhaps approximation may help;
In indicating the revelations.
Despite impending hallucinations,
Of thought and its many variations.
But neither time nor improvements,
Neither intellect nor calculations,
Can touch upon the far side of limitations.

But let come what may come;
Suffers though my expression,
Due to unwanted adulterations,
This I'll state with utmost seriousness:
To look at the unknown without fabrications,
At its various manifestations,
Is greater than all man-made meditations.

VIDEOTHERAPY

Fiction reveals truths that reality obscures. ~Jessamyn West

About once a year or so, I get the chance to visit my hometown. It’s a small town full of greenery and places of historical importance. I grew up here, in this small town. Whenever I come back home, the first thing I do is to see if any of my friends are also here. Most of my friends live out of town, working in big cities. So do I.

I was back in the old town to visit my family. So far, I hadn’t been able to see any of my friends. Most of them came home during some festival or holiday but I had come on a random visit.

One day, I was sitting in a neighborhood café when I heard a familiar voice. “Hullo Bob!” It was my school friend Tommy. Tommy and I hadn’t seen each other for the last five years or so. I knew he was living in the city and was doing very well for himself. “Hullo Tommy!” We embraced each other, shook hands and sat down to have a couple of drinks.

“Well, Tommy, it sure has been a long time since we last met. You look quite different now. How have you been all this time? How’s your job going? Last time I met you, I remember you were in an insurance company.”

“Not any more. That was a long time back. I now work for Videotherapy Inc. You know about it?”

“Sure I do. Everybody does. It’s the new revolution. Videotherapy has changed lives.”

Tommy smiled. “I don’t know about changing lives but it sure has changed fortunes for some.”

Videotherapy was a recent but revolutionary invention in the field of alternative healing and psychology. The name had connotations of hypnotherapy, faith healing and psychoanalysis. Not only did Videotherapy claim to heal physically but also psychologically and spiritually. It claimed to offer solutions to diverse problems ranging from fear to relationship problems to problems in business matters, psychological disorders, and any other problem that one might suggest. Within four years since its arrival on the scene, it had grown immensely in popularity. There were various Videotherapy centers all over the country. It had even attracted international attention, with people from all over the world visiting its centers. They were even planning to open some centers abroad. Many books had been written on the subject and it had featured on many television shows.

I said, “So, how long have you been working for them?”

“Four years.”

“You must’ve been there from the beginning.”

“You’re quite right. It was born before my eyes,” he said with a smile.

“That must’ve been thrilling. I’d like to know more about it.”

“Sure, Bob. I’ll tell you about it. I haven’t told anybody as yet. It’s been a secret. But I’ll tell you as an old friend.”

Read the rest of this story here.

Saturday, June 27, 2009

On Television and Conditioning

I wrote this "faction" more than a year back, collecting data from various sources and compiling it to weave this tale. Much of what I have written here cannot be called mine since I've taken words, almost entire sentences, from the sources mentioned below. The interested reader can find much detailed and exhaustive information about Television and Conditioning from these sources and through his or her own observation.

List of References

[MEDIA SEXPLOITATION, Key, 1976] [Joyce Nelson, THE PERFECT MACHINE; New Society Pub., 1992, 800-253-3605; ISBN 0-86571-235-2]

http://www.turnoffyourtv.com/ Ron Kaufman, TurnOffYourTV.com

The Mind Manipulators, Susan Bryce, http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=191 , Last updated 13/05/2005

EruptingMind.Com http://www.eruptingmind.com/effects-of-tv-on-brain/

Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television (1977) Jerry Mander

Note to the reader:
Krishnamurti’s talk in “Television and Conditioning” has been derived from the following three talks given by him:

Rome 1st Public Talk 4th November 1969
Washington D.C. Talks 1985 1st Public Talk 20th April 1985
Madras 1st Public Talk 28th December 1985

Source:
http://jiddu-krishnamurti.net/index.php
http://tchl.freeweb.hu/

Television and Conditioning - V

It was an extraordinary spring day outside and the hall was almost full. The immensity of the hall and the number of people stood in stark contrast to the lone and solitary figure of Krishnamurti seated on a simple folding chair on a bare stage. His erect body faced the crowd straight on, hands resting gently on his thighs, head seldom moving.

Sam Warren went inside and sat amongst the others to see what the speaker was going to say. The speaker had a slight cold and was holding a handkerchief in his hand. “I see the same old crowd is here again,” he said, not smiling. He then proceeded to give the following talk:

“I would like to know why you are all here. I really mean it. With what intention, with what purpose, with what kind of imaginary or superstitious concepts one has. And perhaps, if I may be so bold as to suggest it, you might have come with those ideas, with those formulas. And I am afraid you will be disappointed because — I hope you can hear, all right? I hope you all can hear — one has talked all over the world for a long time, seventy years, that’s a long time, and one has naturally built up all kinds of fanciful, superstitious imaginary reputations, and those reputations, those images that one has created are really meaningless because what we are talking about is totally different from a lecture. A lecture is meant to inform, to instruct, to guide and so on. This is not a lecture.

“Please, we must be very clear on that point. This is not a lecture. There is no intention on the part of the speaker to guide you, to help you — forgive me if I use that word — or to inform you about something you would like to be talked about, theoretical, superstitious, imaginary, a fixation, as it were.

“But we are going to deliberate together. That word has a very deep meaning; deliberate means weigh together, take counsel together, nourish each other, not physically, I hope, but psychologically, intellectually and penetrate as deeply as possible into one’s own consciousness, into its own function, its own way of thinking, living. This is not a theoretical meeting, talking about various things that should be, or that have not been, but together, you and the speaker are taking counsel together, weighing things together. Please, this is not just a lot of words. The speaker really means what he says, whether you like it or not. He says we are going to take counsel together, weigh things together, not I weigh and then tell you about it, but rather that together you and the speaker take counsel together, weigh together. This is not propaganda because we are together investigating, asking, questioning, doubting.

“So together we are going to look at this world, that is ourselves. Right? Are you willing? Or are you frightened, hiding behind all kinds of absurd theories, all the psychological innuendos, all the things man has put together as they call it religion, the existing society, that is the degeneration that is gradually going on: pollution in all the cities, despoiling the air, and also corruption. This is what we are caught in. So what has gone wrong with us? Or is this a natural course? You understand my question? Do you really want to listen to all this rubbish? You must read about all this in newspapers, if they are honest, magazines, and of course all the gurus in the world have destroyed that thing which they want.

“So let us begin, but please bear in mind this is not a lecture. You haven’t come to listen to me. You have come to listen to yourself, however complicated that self is, however superficial, however deep. We are going to go into all that. It’s up to you, because otherwise you, as a listener, may say, yes, yes, it sounds very good, or not at all good. It is not logical, or illogical and so on. Right?

“Is this clear? Don’t agree, please. You are not agreeing with me, this is a fact. You are not used to this kind of thinking, that is your trouble.

“Do you understand something of what I am saying? Good! We are going to talk about this matter of conditioning. This is a human problem — as a whole, not of a particular group or a particular people, or of a particular culture. Can one respond to this, totally, as a whole phenomenon, not a particular kind of phenomena?

“So you are faced with yourself, who is part of this world, part of this degeneration. How do you then respond? Being driven into a corner, seeing actually what is taking place, your own house burning, how will you act?

“Can one rely on one’s own intelligence, on one’s own understanding, on one’s own experience, knowledge? The experience, the knowledge, the understanding, are they not also conditioned, by the society, by the culture in which one lives? And can one rely on that conditioning? Has not this conditioning produced this chaos in the world? You understand what is implied in all this? If you cannot possibly rely on any outside agency, because that led to wars, brutality, bureaucracy — if you cannot rely on any outside agency can you rely on yourself? Yourself, are you strong enough, clear enough, unconfused; seeing the whole thing, not just little patches of it? And, ourselves, each one, is so fragile; we haven’t got intelligence enough; there’s no vital demand to find out. So, what is one to do? Despair? Live only for the present; enjoy oneself? Just let things go?

“You understand the issue? You cannot rely on outside, you can’t rely on yourself. Your self is the result of the outside world in which you have lived and which you have created. The society is you and you are the society; the two are not separate. If you reject that you reject also this, and you must. So what is it that you are rejecting? Are you following this? When you reject the outside world, the outside authority, the priest, the church, the whole structure, are you not also rejecting yourself, throwing it away? Because that which is outside of you is part of you. You’re Christian, Catholic, Protestant, Buddhist, Hindu, Communist, this or that, you’re conditioned and when you reject that you must also reject your own conditioning. And can one be free of one’s conditioning? Not partly, in patches here and there, but entirely, completely, wholly, both the conscious as well as the unconscious. After all, that is freedom. And it is only in that freedom that there is right action; total action, which will respond wholly to this vast phenomenon.

“So that is the issue: to free the mind. The mind, not your mind or my mind, but the mind of man — which is you — from all his conditioning. Can one attack the problem that way? Because otherwise we are not free and because we are not free there is chaos in the world. And freedom is this absolute unconditioning of the mind. And if we don’t we shall always live in prison, decorated more or less, become great technicians, go to the moon and further, put the flag on Venus, or the cross on Mars, or the red flag somewhere else and so on. We will always be in sorrow, in confusion.

“So can one be aware of this conditioning at all the levels of our consciousness not just on the superficial level, deep down, in the innermost recesses of one’s mind, and free it, and dissolve this conditioning, the conditioning of violence, hate, jealousy, ambition, greed; the division between you and me, we and they? The tradition, the memories, the thousand years of propaganda, the conditioning which divides man against man?

“So can one become so totally aware that one sees one’s conditioning and dissolves it? Not during the course of many years, because if you allow time, many years, in that concession to time there are other factors entering into that field, other pressures and strains which prevent you from dissolving the conditioning. So you cannot possibly rely on time, on evolution, therefore it must be done instantly, immediately.

“I do not know if you follow all this, if it has any meaning at all. When the house is burning you don’t sit back and say, ‘Who set it on fire?’, the you, the old age, the old tradition, discuss the length of hair of the man who must have set it on fire and so on and so on and so on. You act. In the same way, becoming aware of this conditioning, one must act instantly. The incapacity to act instantly is degeneration. And that is what is happening in the world. Knowing one is conditioned, and not being aware of it, and carrying on. Or being aware of it and not doing anything about it.

“So, if you say that it’s not possible for the mind to be unconditioned, ever, as many do, then you have no problem, then you carry on as you are. But if you investigate, explore freely, as one must, confronted with this madness that’s going on in the world, then it’s not a question of possibility or impossibility but investigation — not analysis, because analysis implies time; the cause and the effect and so on, and on. And when you analyze there is also division between the analyzer and the thing analyzed. But the analyzer is part of the analysis, is the thing analyzed; the two are not separate. So you have this outward phenomenon which is the inward phenomenon. The inward state is the outward state, which is not just a theory but it’s an actuality.

“We have created this society, organized it, until the human being radically changes, deep down in his psyche, we will create organization and bureaucracies, perhaps modified from what they are now, but they’ll be the same, until we come down to something very basic, fundamental, which is whether the human mind — the mind that you and I have — is the result of a million years, therefore it’s not personal mind. It’s the whole content of history, of all the struggles and experience of man. And that mind is conditioned, and the only answer to this challenge of deterioration is complete freedom from this conditioning, and in that there’s complete action, not inadequate action. There’s no permanent continuance of anything — conditioning itself is impermanent.

“So long as I do not know myself, the ways and compulsions of my own mind, unconscious as well as conscious, there must be suffering. After all, we suffer because of ignorance — ignorance in the sense of not knowing ourselves. By your own acts you are being conditioned, but at any moment you can break the chain of limitation. Is there a permanent thing in you? You are changing, your body changes, unless you are dead. Everything is in movement, but you refuse to accept that movement. The brain has been registering for millennia. Therefore, registering has become part of it. The brain has become mechanical.

“I say: Can that mechanical process stop? That is all. If it cannot be stopped it becomes merely a machine, which it is. This is all part of tradition, part of repetition, part of the constant registration through millennia. I am asking a simple question which has great depth to it, which is: Can it stop? If it cannot stop, man is never free.

“Can the brain ever be free from all the programs it has received? Is it possible through watching the very activity of thought? Can you be aware of your thoughts, your reactions, and your responses? This watchfulness makes the brain extraordinarily acute, sharp, and clear. This clarity is freedom. When one sees life as it is, when one sees oneself as one is, only from there can one move ahead.”

When he finished, he rose from his chair as though to walk slowly off stage. Suddenly the audience stood up and began to applaud vigorously. Krishnamurti turned around in his steps, faced the crowd and with an impatient flick of the wrist in an effort to subdue the clatter asked, “But what are you clapping for?” and then added in a somewhat exasperated voice, “Perhaps you are clapping for yourself. You are not encouraging the speaker or discouraging him. He doesn’t want a thing from you. When you yourself become both the teacher and the disciple — disciple being a man who is learning, learning, learning, not accumulating knowledge — then you are an extraordinary human being.” Without further ado, he turned around again and walked quietly off the stage.

Thereafter, there were some discussions among participants around the place and outside, some carried on in cafés and some along the road. It seemed to be exciting and stimulating for people and most of them paired off or formed same-interest clusters.

Sam Warren had listened to the entire thing attentively. He didn’t talk about it to anybody, he didn’t mix in the group, he didn’t discuss or analyze it. He went outside and went on a long drive. He did not think anything. His face seemed calm. He drove towards the mountains and looked at the trees, the birds, and smelled the fresh mountain air. He felt as if he were seeing the world for the first time. He could neither think forwards nor backwards. He didn’t know if he had ever had any problems or worries. He didn’t remember.


The End

Television and Conditioning - IV

Sam Warren went to Rome and enjoyed the Mediterranean climate. For a while, he quite forgot his worries and problems. He visited the various historical places and admired the beautiful architecture.

One day, during his vacation, he passed by some people who were discussing ‘conditioning.’ This caught Sam Warren’s attention, and he saw that they were standing near a big hall. The crowd was a mixed one, with people of various nationalities present. He asked some of the people what they were discussing and he was told that there was a person by the name of J. Krishnamurti, giving some kind of a lecture about conditioning. When he asked who this person was, he was told that he was some kind of Indian philosopher or guru.

“He’s another of those Indian gurus you see coming to the West these days. I bet he’s another fraud, coming to lecture people to gain popularity,” said one.

“He’s a philosopher, I think, or maybe more of a psychologist, I gather from his talks, though he denies being either of them,” said another.

“He’s an Indian ex-Theosophist turned California sage. He was schooled in the West where he was groomed by the Theosophists to become what they called ‘World Teacher.’ I hear he was involved in various scandals, as were the other theosophists, including love affairs with older and married women,” said the first one.

“I came here because I am generally interested in Krishnamurti and the early history of the Theosophical Society,” said the second one.

Then came another gentleman, who seemed to be more informed. “The Theosophists had adopted and groomed Krishnamurti to be a ‘World Teacher,’ an incarnation of Lord Maitreya. However, when he grew up, he broke off with the society. But Krishnamurti did turn into an exceptional person. As he gradually matured, he came to reject the Messiah’s throne that was offered to him. An entire organization, The Order of the Star in the East, had been set up to prepare the world for his coming. Krishnamurti rejected all formal creeds and doctrines, renounced his own special status, and disbanded the Order in 1929.”

“I think all that is just showmanship,” said the first one. “It’s just another show set up by these so-called spiritualists who want to cash in on the gullibility of people.”

“Krishnamurti’s path, if one were to follow it, would be a path to absolute freedom for the individual self,” said the third one. “As such it is an exceedingly hard path to walk. Of course, what he says has been said before and probably done before by others too. Maybe what he says is more relevant in these times. I’ve read a lot of books and I feel that what he says is somewhat similar to what some existentialists have written, including Dostoevsky, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard.”

“Krishnamurti’s teachings, though in some ways radical, do contain inherent contradictions,” replied the first one. “One of his major messages is that there is no path, no way, no teaching that will take you to the truth. And yet he’s supported by a million dollar organization designed to spread his teachings. This was pointed out by another Krishnamurti, U. G. Krishnamurti, a South Indian about 20 years younger who came to similar though more radical conclusions and on more than one occasion challenged Krishnamurti to live by his own words.”

“I hear that some say that what he says is the same as in the Vedanta; others say that it’s the same as Buddha’s teachings,” said the second one. “So I’m just wondering then why he denies all tradition. Though he is a guru, why does he deny being one?”

“I’ve been listening to him for the last 40 years and I go where he goes to give a talk,” replied the third one. “I feel that there is something deeply true in what he says and I somehow see it too, whenever I hear him saying it, but after that it just vanishes. I think he has something going but I’m unable to be clear about it. What he says seems simple enough but I feel that I haven’t understood it. It would be easy of course to give up or to say that either it’s nothing or I’m just not able to get it, but I’m unable to do any of that.”

“I tell you, don’t get fooled by these people who do nothing but feed on your confusion, your sense of emptiness,” said the first. “They do nothing but exploit and manipulate people.”

“Well, I’d like to go and hear what he says,” said the second. “I enjoy reading him and hearing him speak, if nothing else.”

Television and Conditioning - III

The psychologist was staying in a hotel in the suburbs. Sam called him up and made an appointment. When Sam arrived at the hotel, the psychologist was sitting in the lobby chatting with an old lady. In five minutes, he got free and came towards Sam. He shook hands with him and asked him the purpose of his visit. Sam gave him a brief account of what he had been going through lately and also commented on the article that the psychologist had written and how it made him feel.

“Your problem may not be directly due to the effects of television, as I mentioned in that article, but it is surely related. Television is definitely a cause but it is not the only cause. It is the conditioning effect of the environment, which includes television, amongst other things. However, television may be and usually is the most powerful and potent medium of conditioning. It is when one becomes slightly aware of it and sees the actual truth of it, and not as an idea or theory, that one becomes afraid and fearful. It affects the personality in many ways causing depression, anxiety and a sense of dissociation.”

“I don’t quite understand what you mean,” Sam replied. “Do you mean that we are conditioned, as in programmed, and we are not what we think we are but are what various sources have molded us into, including television, which you say is the most potent and powerful amongst these mind manipulators?”

“Yes, that’s what I’m saying, partly. Most of us like to think that our own minds and thought processes are impenetrable. We like to think that other people can be manipulated, but we cannot. We believe that our opinions, values, ideas and beliefs are totally autonomous. One of the principal tools in the mind manipulation arsenal is television, the cultural arm of the established industrial order. Television, the drug of the world, maintains, stabilizes and reinforces ideas, attitudes and behaviors through its programming and advertising.”

“But don’t we learn from our environment, doesn’t watching television educate us, inform us too?”

“It is important to differentiate between conditioning and education. Does TV educate or does it condition us? Education is when you are involved, critically examining everything and seeing the facts of them and not just receiving and accepting blindly. You may think that TV does no harm because you know it’s not real, but did you know that your subconscious believes it to be real? Do you know that they don’t teach us one very important thing in schools, which is: the word is not the actual. The description, the image, the word, the symbol is not the actual. We are not taught that and our brains are not able to differentiate between them. That’s why we think that the word is the thing. How many of us think that the word ‘love’ is love? Aren’t we conditioned by the word?”

“I think so,” Sam replied, “But I’m not very clear about it. I do agree that it’s sometimes hard for me to differentiate between the real and imagined.”

“I have done a lot of research on this and have spent almost all my life learning about it. I think it is a very important subject. I’ll give you some facts. Did you know in America, children and adolescents spend 22 to 28 hours per week viewing television, more than any other activity except sleeping? That means that by the age of 70 they will have spent 7 to 10 years of their lives watching TV. On average people watch 5-6 hours of TV every day. This figure is only an average; many people, especially children, watch far more than this. This not only programs their minds from an early age, but may also damage their brains, causing them to grow up and behave more like an animal than a human, thus driven by basic desires such as sex, violence and food.”

“That’s astonishing. But not all people watch TV. Would you say that even the people who don’t watch much TV are prone to some kind of passive effects through others who do watch a lot of TV?”

“Yes, I would say that. It is infectious. After all, it’s collective subconscious, not just an individual consciousness. What affects others affects you too. More than any other single effect, television places images in our brains.”

“Yes, I remember having some dreams which I couldn’t quite place. Then I recalled that the images I saw in my dreams were a part of some TV show I had seen a couple of years ago.”

“I think that psychologically, we are still at a very primitive stage. We have not yet learned to distinguish in our minds between natural images and those which are artificially created and implanted. That is why I said our education should teach us that the word, the image, the idea is not the real, is never the actual.”

“Yes,” said Sam, “I think I’m beginning to see your point.”

“TV has everything to program your mind. You know what that means? It means you are conditioned, programmed by outside sources, like a computer is programmed. That means that the brain becomes like a machine, accepting, recording and working within the program, never free and never original. Therefore, TV can be and usually is used to program you into behaving, reacting, responding as per the program. It may seem fantastic when you hear this but it’s the truth.”

“But it’s hard to believe. It still seems to me like fiction, like in that movie, Matrix.”

“Of course, that’s how you’ll feel. As I told you, the brain more or less loses the faculty of distinguishing between the real and the imaginary, since it is used to believing in everything it sees. Wait, I’ll give you some more facts. Did you know watching TV puts the viewer into a highly suggestible sleeplike hypnotic state? This provides easy access to the subconscious. When you watch TV, your brain activity switches from the left side of your brain, which is responsible for logical thought and critical analysis, to the right side. And the right side of the brain does not critically analyze incoming information; instead it uses an emotional response. This means there is little or no analysis of incoming information. Right brain activity causes the body to release chemicals called endorphins which have natural sedative properties similar to the drug heroin. It is therefore not only possible, but probable, for a person to become physically addicted to TV. This ensures constant daily exposure, a critical factor involved in programming the mind. It also reduces higher brain activity, promoting activity in lower brain regions. In other words it makes you less intelligent and more likely to behave like an animal.”

“Okay, is that the reason why advertising is so successful and why we see so many commercials while watching TV?”

“Yes, that is something which is exploited by the marketers, the industry people, intentionally or unintentionally. There are subliminal suggestions being hidden in certain advertisements. Not only that, words and phrases are used in specifically crafted ways to influence your thoughts.”

“These people who use these things to program us, manipulate our minds, who are they? Is it one person or many? Is it an organization or the government? And do they have our best interests at heart?”

“I don’t know about this,” said the psychologist. “But it is surely a sign of our collective ignorance, irresponsibility and self-interest. Mainly self-interest, which is the base of all corruption. Anyway, I’m sure for those who are involved in this, the underlying assumption is that the public must be manipulated for its own good. Many advertising strategies involve covert methods to trick the consumer into believing their lives are incomplete and deficient without the promoted product; only through purchasing the commodity will the consumer’s life be ‘whole’ or ‘better’ again. Many advertisements send the message ‘you’re not good enough’ unless you drink the right soft drink, buy a new car, use the perfect shampoo or stock up on scented toilet paper. Other messages subconsciously prey upon guilt, anxieties or hostilities. Many people, hundreds of times a day, are hearing or reading subliminally that they’re not good enough. This continual suggestion is a major cause of stress, and certainly the cause of much dissatisfaction, anxiety and even illness.”

“Yes, I agree. How many times have I felt this way but could never put a finger on it? I think that suggestibility exists constantly within our psyches, determining our state of being, our consciousness and our relationship to ourselves and the world around us.”

“While the power of suggestion is generally exercised unconsciously in our day to day existence, it is exploited deliberately and ruthlessly in the world of advertising. What a person watches DOES influence them, and this is well known by the behaviorists in the group. In fact, they know that TV is a tool that they purposely use to influence ‘the masses.’ The medical industry, for example, does not want people who would buy and consume according to their own requirements. Rather, they want them to buy on suggestion. Many advertisements offer cures for a debilitating array of ills from headaches and backache to constipation, prostate problems and premenstrual tension. The sheer ubiquity of such promised cures convinces us, if only by suggestion, that we must need them, and that we must or should be suffering from the afflictions that they claim to alleviate.

“Subliminal advertising was exposed in the 1950s,” the psychologist continued, “When some TV commercials were discovered to be transmitting split-second images that were designed to stimulate a viewer’s desire for a certain product. For example, during a soft drink commercial, an advertiser might have flashed the message ‘I’m thirsty’ without the viewer realizing it.”

“I just recalled some article that I read a while back about an Army using something like this to create soldiers who will kill more,” said Sam. “After the Second World War the Army recognized the need to create a soldier who was more willing to kill. This came after reports that many soldiers would purposely miss or aim low when shooting the enemy. Soldiers did not want to kill, and when they did kill they would feel lots of remorse. To remedy this, one method that was used amongst others was to make them watch violent images on screen, especially before going into battle. The effect was to desensitize the soldier to violence, thereby making him more willing to kill.”

“That’s programming for you!”

“I think that the effect would be worse in the case of children.”

“Yes, it is very concerning and very disturbing,” the psychologist agreed. “Do you know advertising and marketing firms have long used the insights and research methods of psychology to sell products to children? Today these practices are reaching epidemic proportions. Psychologists, marketing people, and advertising and entrepreneurial firms work together to try to understand how best to sell things to young children. Psychologists are regulars at marketing conferences and in business magazines. Many advertisers brag that their understanding of child psychology gives them the edge when serving clients. Using psychological principles to sell products to children means not only selling a product, but also a larger value system that says making money and using money to purchase material goods is the road to happiness.

“Not only that,” he continued, “But the programs that are aired on the television for children, the so-called ‘children’s programs,’ are really creating havoc in the children’s psyche. I remember reading somewhere that some psychologists in Russia had called on the government to ban a television cartoon, asserting that a 25th shot system was applied in the cartoon which negatively affects children’s sub-consciousness. As a result of this shot’s impact, a ‘neuro-linguistic programming’ occurs, or, to put it in other words, zombifying. The psychologists characterize this phenomenon as ‘intellectual genocide.’ In their view, the cartoon calls for cruelty and aggression, while numerous signs on the heroes’ costumes symbolize death.”

“TV today has a profound influence on our society,” said Sam, “And especially young children. I don’t think anyone is untouched by it. Even women, I think, are usually a target of this and are greatly affected by it. How television has been continually defining things like beauty, love, fitness, health etc. for the masses.”

“Yes, women are carefully trained by the media to view themselves as inadequate. They are taught that other women — through the purchase of clothes, cosmetics, food, vocations, avocations, education, etc. — are more desirable and feminine than themselves. That’s the case with most women, if they do not realize this consciously. You see, TV itself is like a mass-mind. It’s a different world altogether and for many people, it is the real world. Real-life experience is replaced by the mediated ‘experience’ of television viewing. The TV ‘world’ becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: the mass mind takes shape, its participants acting according to media-driven impulses and believing them to be their own personal volition arising out of their own desires and needs.”

“But are we so helpless against it all? Isn’t there some kind of filter or protective covering in our brain which is somehow related to our experiences, memories and learning, something that is our own, part of our identity?”

“You see, the critical side of your brain is the left. As you hear this you are making judgments, passing opinions and coming to conclusions. Whether they are ‘stupid nonsense’ or ‘I knew it,’ they are being caused by beta brain waves. These are the waves activated when you begin to use that left hand side, the center of logical human communication and analysis — the certain something that separates us from other mammals. Researchers have found that once the television set is switched on that left hand side and all its faculties tends to switch off. Instead the images from television’s 300,000 little dots (which make up the picture) go straight to the right brain. The switch from beta to alpha waves shows this. Alpha brain waves are the ones we associate with meditation, sleep and zombification.

“Some years ago the Journal of Advertising Research compared the brain activity of reading, say a newspaper, with the activity while watching the box. Conclusions: the response was different. The response to print may fairly be described as active, while the response to television may fairly be called passive. I think it is important to realize that when a person watches TV, they go into an alpha brain wave state, in which they are more suggestible than normal.

“Have you ever noticed the glazed expression on the face of a person who has been watching TV for any length of time? This is from being in prolonged alpha state and a semi dissociative state.”

“Yes,” said Sam, “I’m aware of that. I have myself found myself lost in that state plenty of times. I realize that I become what I watch on TV.”

“Right. You’ve got it! Let me give you some more facts. There was research conducted in the 1960s by Professor George Gerbner, Dean of the Annenberg School of Communications at the University of Pennsylvania, which showed that television has protracted effects which are gradual and indirect, but cumulative and significant. He found that heavy watching of television cultivated attitudes that were more consistent with the world of television programs than with the everyday world. For example, heavy television viewers tend to develop a ‘mean world syndrome,’ believing that the world is a nastier place than do light television viewers. He also discovered that television watching cultivated a symbolic message about law and order with the action-adventure genre reinforcing a faith in law and order, the status quo and social justice, with the villains and the bad people always getting what they deserve.”

“Yes, that’s what we discussed about people living in different worlds rather than in the real world, which is the only world where one can live.”

“Before television, there was conversation around the dinner table or people used to go out and meet people,” the psychologist replied. “Technology now stands between us and each other, between people and the natural world. We know our virtual ‘neighbors’ on television better than our real neighbors next door. As communities and extended family structures decay, the isolated individual becomes easy prey for the mind manipulators. As cathode ray reality becomes genuine reality, public opinion becomes homogenized and mainstreamed, widespread apathy and indifference prevail.

“This mainstreaming of opinion is evident in nightly news bulletins, which have become a source of entertainment first and information second,” he continued. “Local television stations all report the same news simultaneously, even using the same footage. Despite the similarities, each claims to be ‘the best,’ ‘the latest’ or ‘the most up to date.’ In reality, they are hardly different and it is difficult for the public to distinguish one from the other.

“Commenting on this subtle mind manipulation, former CIA agent Philip Agee, in his book On the Run, observes: ‘Television news is show business, designed to entertain and intentionally or not, programmed to keep people ignorant.’

“And with the advent of ‘reality’ television, the boundaries between the real world and the virtual world have been inextricably blurred by the mind manipulators. As real-life experiences are replaced by the mediated experiences of reality and fantasy, gained via television viewing, it becomes easy for politicians and market researchers to rely on a base of predetermined mass experience that can be evoked by appropriate triggers. As the mass mind takes shape, its participants act according to media-driven impulses, believing them to be their own personal choices arising out of their own desires and needs.

“Most people believe the news shown on TV to be real and the opinions presented therein to be the truth. In fact, news watching, like newspaper reading, is something of a habit with most people. They say it keeps them informed. All that information, which they believe to be true and factual, seems to increase their knowledge and understanding.

“I’m sure that’s what most people do believe. I myself know some people who cannot function without reading the newspaper, and news according to them is an essential part of living. It is easy to see that it’s simply another means of entertainment. Moreover, it is usually the quality of the shows that is often criticized. However, this is missing the point. Television shows are not supposed to be thought provoking. You are not supposed to question the images you see on TV, only believe in their prima facie existence.

“Television programs, commercials, news reports and talk shows are all designed toward blind acceptance by the viewer. Because, after all, if you see it with your own eyes, it must be true. It must be real. Reality inside a box!”

“This widespread damage, is it permanent, is it something that can be remedied?” Sam asked. “Is there any way to undo the mind control damage already done by TV?”

“Turn it off. Easier said than done. Once the input stops, it isn’t constantly reinforced. But really, it isn’t as simple as that. In 1977, an American activist and former advertising executive named Jerry Mander wrote a book called Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television. In the book, he talks about not only the contents of the television images, but the effects television has on the human mind and body. His discussion includes: the induction of alpha waves, a hypnotizing effect that a motionless mind enters; the way viewers often regard what they see on television as real even though the programs are filled with quick camera switches, rapid image movement, computer generated objects, computer generated morphing and other technical effects; the placement of artificial images into our mind’s eye; and the effects that large amounts of television viewing have on children and the onset of attention deficit disorder.

“Further, he states, ‘The horror of television is that the information goes in, but we don’t react to it. It goes right into our memory pool and perhaps we react to it later but we don’t know what we’re reacting to. When you watch television you are training yourself not to react and so later on, you’re doing things without knowing why you’re doing them or where they came from.’

“‘Television offers neither rest nor stimulation,’ Mander says. ‘Television inhibits your ability to think, but it does not lead to freedom of mind, relaxation or renewal. It leads to a more exhausted mind. You may have time out from prior obsessive thought patterns, but that’s as far as television goes. The mind is never empty, the mind is filled. What’s worse, it is filled with someone else’s obsessive thoughts and images.’

“Well, why do you think they call it programming? Mander goes into great detail discussing the physical effects television viewing has on the human mind and body. His analysis is excellent.”

“I’ve heard of that book,” Sam stated. “I think I read the name in one of Linda Goodman’s books long ago. It was mentioned there as suggested reading.”

“Mander argues that the brain cannot fight against the continuous and unending encroachment of modern video technology. We will naturally and fluidly believe all that we see. Once the images are inside you, they imprint upon your memory. They become yours. What’s more, the images remain in you permanently."

“‘Imagination and reality have merged,’ wrote Mander. ‘We have lost control of our images. We have lost control of our minds.’ This placement of images in our brain he calls ‘Video Memory Implantation’ and goes on to state that it is changing the human brain forever. It may now take many years for the human mind to once again break free.”

“That sounds so threatening,” Sam replied. “Am I doomed to forever carry these images and memories inside my brain?”

“The answer, unfortunately, is yes.”

They continued their discussion for some more time, after which Sam Warren left the hotel and went directly to his place. He was feeling quite hopeless and helpless and his sense of isolation increased. He could see that his problem was that he was conditioned and that he was doomed to be in that state forever. He was feeling quite low and decided to go on a vacation. He took leave from work and went to Rome for a holiday.

Television and Conditioning - II

One day, he read an article in the newspaper by a psychologist who was visiting the country from the U.S. This psychologist was renowned in the field of neuropsychology and cognitive psychology. The article mentioned the effects of television on the human mind. It ran like this:

Have you ever watched yourself watching television? What happens? There are two things one can do – directly perceive the images and the sounds first and thereby approach the television from oneself; and watch the content and thereby approach yourself from the television. Most of us approach the television from the latter angle and thus get completely lost in it – we let the television invade our minds, without first perceiving the kinds of images that are being shown. If one approaches the form before the content, one will simply find most of the images and sounds shown on the television to be repulsive and offensive to the senses. It is because we do not directly see, because we do not understand this first impression, that we get lost in the content and then the good and bad in the TV depends on our conclusions, ideas and likes or dislikes.

Television as it exists now is nothing but a marketing tool for making money by offending one’s senses by displaying all kinds of rubbish images and by invading the feeble and impressionable human mind. One might’ve experienced a certain heaviness in the brain during or after watching television for a short duration of time. Many times, the residue of the images and sounds displayed remains in the brain. It is because we think it is harmless and let it work on us that more and more new ways of using it to deteriorate the mind are being invented. A mind that is in a habit of watching television regularly, is exposed to it for many years, has more or less lost some of its natural faculties. Moreover, it must also affect the brain cells, perhaps damaging some and killing some. This is only the direct effect of television, not to forget the image making process that starts in the mind – the mind becomes occupied with images and ideas rather than with facts. This is a serious threat facing humankind, especially young brains.

One watches television, listens to music, reads, plays video games, etc., because the mind has simply become addicted to these artificial stimulations, to be kept occupied with some thing or the other all the time. It seriously alters the mind’s capacity to be free of illusions and to see things as they are. It fills the mind with all kinds of unnecessary images and sounds – one can see this for oneself when all kinds of thoughts and sounds just pop up in one’s head. This makes the mind mechanical, insensitive and incapable of direct perception of things. It also affects one’s physical vision, fatigues the mind and makes one lazy.

Now, it is a crisis situation since the people who make the media their profession become engaged in wielding its power shamelessly. One can see this in the programs that are aired on television; most of them are far away from the basic logic of things. This shows how ignorant and stupid these people are who are not only living their lives amidst all this but are also imposing the same on almost everybody. Their minds have already deteriorated and they project their deterioration and senselessness onto the masses, who are impressionable and after a time start believing in the senseless as the real in a most natural way. This has been the lot of mankind for the last 20 years or so. However, the speed at which this is occurring is increasing, and the younger generation which is exposed to it shall have to bear the brunt of it. The whole human consciousness is now so filled with content of all kinds that it has become ever more difficult for people to be free of all this accumulation and live a sane and healthy life.

Sam Warren read the article and felt quite alarmed. He had never approached the matter from this angle. He thought this might just be the author’s point of view. But what if it was a fact? What if it was one of the reasons for what was happening to him? He grew more confused as he pondered upon it.

He had been an avid TV watcher since his childhood. Television had been his companion, consolation and diversion. He had never thought about this point. Now that he started to think along these lines, he found that much of what he had learned, known, and felt came from television. He remembered nostalgically how watching TV in the old days had transported him into some magical world, or in another kind of world, of which he was a part as well as spectator. These worlds had been changing but they always gave him great pleasure.

He had learned about the emotions – the wide range of them – by seeing people on screen using them. He had known how to smile, how to laugh, how to cry by watching various characters cry, smile, and laugh. He had known and learned how to walk, how to talk, how to think of life and almost every other thing through television. He had learned about many places, about great men, about great deeds, through television. He had taken part in all of them, lived them, suffered with them, enjoyed with them, through television.

His language, his action, his beliefs, his ideas, his range of knowledge and information were all through television. He remembered how in many cases when he did not know what to do or how to react he would recall how some of his favorite characters would react and he would do it exactly the same way. He also recalled how lately he could not even find solace in TV. He recalled how he could not even enjoy watching TV as he used to earlier. He kept on pondering on all of this and reflected on how much of his personality was shaped by TV.

He found out about the psychologist who had written the article and decided to visit him.

Television and Conditioning - I

Sam Warren hadn’t felt good for quite some days. He had been having constant headaches and was feeling anxious but didn’t know why. He could not focus on his work any more. He felt exhausted even though his was a desk job and not much work was coming his way lately. He could sleep well but when he woke up, he would soon start feeling exhausted and fatigued. He would feel a sense of desperate loneliness, anxiety and depression in his heart and could not look at anything in a clear light. He did not feel happy any more, about anything. He could not enjoy the things he had previously enjoyed doing. He had never felt like this before.

Sensing his inner condition, one of his office colleagues told him to go a doctor. He went to a doctor, told him the symptoms and was given some medicines to take. He took the medicines, and ate the food suggested by the doctor, but nothing happened. He seemed to be stuck in that condition. Then someone suggested he go to a psychiatrist.

He went to a psychiatrist, who asked him a lot of questions to which he did not have an answer as such. The psychiatrist told him not to think too much, not to worry, to think positive, and to take a holiday. He did all that and for a month felt just fine. However, when he returned and started the same schedule again, his condition once again deteriorated.

He had dreams which did not make sense to him. He could even be aware while dreaming that he was dreaming and he could see that his dreams were simply a continuation of what went on during the day. As long as he was unconscious of it, it was just fine, but being conscious of it and seeing the engines of his mind running even during the night as during the day, he felt utterly miserable. He felt cornered, hopeless, and in utter despair. He found no rest, neither when awake nor during sleep. He became extremely conscious of it all, with his life becoming one series of continual conscious misery. He could switch it off by going off on a vacation or indulging himself in something for some time, but now he had become very conscious of this as an escape and knew that the problem would come back again. He was also very tired of running away all the time. He was always on the edge and could not see either forward or backwards in time. The fear that every day would be the same and that this conflict would go on for the rest of his life tortured him and made him very miserable.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

A MYSTICAL MELODY

A mystical symphony floats in the air
As I come searching after a vague scent
Draped by the dense smoke of perfumed clouds
Wrapped in the stark loneliness of wee hours

I encounter a strange fire that hath
Neither smoke nor spark, but only a faint
Glow of darkling orange, shaded by
Kinetic purple hues of unworldly flowers

An unknown yet strangely familiar song
Reaches my anticipant ear, as the clouds
Arise permitting few fibrils of sunlight
Bringing me close to the distant melody

A strange, strong pull my heart feels
As grappling, endeavoring, I move ahead
Taking precipitant steps towards the spot
Whence comes the unknown allurement

The enchantment I can hardly articulate
The sensations I can hardly explicate
How do you catch the wind in your fist?
How do you mimic the joy of creation?
Give me a pen that hath wine for ink!
Give me paper made from a divine tree!

Sing I must for my heart is overflowing
As tides of immensity flowing in and out
Come; hear the song I am eager to share
Sit with me, and let us hear the mystical melody

On passing by the familiar flowers
I smiled and laughed with newfound joy
I walked on air as I walked past
The ugly structures no longer seeming ugly

The flowers spoke to me and I was them
I was their scent and I was their color
All the colors of the earth were alive
And I was bathed in a timeless ecstasy

My usually strong heart was beating fast
My eyes were shedding uncontrollable tears
The unbearable silence stretched far and wide
And the mystical music was flowing in the air

My legs were shaking, I could hardly stand
I sat with my back against a tree; and the tree
Was alive, a part of me, as was everything else
I fainted; the beauty was too much for me

I came to when the sun had come up
Seemingly feeling drained of all strength
It was gone; and once again I was lonely
In the dreary landscape of monotony and dullness

For long I searched for it in every corner
Of the earth, of my mind, its picture in my heart
But nowhere could I find it; until one day, I heard
The whispering winds say to me: die to yourself!